To the people of Europe, please purchase and read my book KNDU187, prior to placing US false NMD technologies in your home country. Many secrets for you to figure out. 
KNDU187 paper back book is available. Fiction, or is it? 

ORDER by clicking here on: KNDU187  or on Amazon.com 

NiraSchwartz.com
 National Missile Defense [NMD] Fraud;
Government Corruption; 
and
  Trials Exhibits
Whistle Blower [Qui-Tam] Cases: 

D.C. 96-3065 RSWL - Appeal 9th Circuit Case 03-55495
D.C. 01-4937 RSWL - Appeal 9th Circuit Case 03-55571 - Petition

US Federal Claims Cases: 03-37C - US Court of Appeal 05-5063 - US Supreme 
US Federal Claims Cases: 03-786C - US Court of Appeal 04-5113

CA State BAR Complaint: 05-2875; Appeal; First Response; US Supreme 05-11161
NAVY Complaint:  20050489 - Final Decline to accept
FOIA - Refused

D.C. 06-4010 DDP (JCx)Schwartz vs. Government, MIT, LLNL, AERO
Appeal to the 9th Circuit case 07-55091

Home
KNDU187 Book
KNDU2008 Patent
Criminal Reports
Jamieson Committee
Fragile NMD Technology
GAO Reports
US Attorney General
Case 96-3065 RSWL
Physics Laws
FBI Letter
Consulting US Government
Government Corruption
Please Help
Contact me
N. Korea Threat
Raytheon CV 01-4937 RSWL
Boeing & HOT BACK-UP
Raytheon Legal VA
MIT/LL False Reports
My Reply 05-5063
International
Current News
Northrop/G. HR Manual
'SSSS' Yellow
NAVY - Games
US Supreme Court
Links
Letter to US President
Wally Beitzel Deposition
Conflict Of Interest
ARMY Scope Of Work
NMD Contract DASG60-90-C-0165
Ray Maddalone Deposition
Roy Danchick Deposition
Henry J. Crowder Deposition
NMD-My-Copyrights
New Warhead Patent
Hon. Congressman H. Berman
FOIA - refused
State Bar Complaint
Case D.C. 06-4010 DDP (JCx)

 

  • On June 26, 2006 I filed a case where the US Government, MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Aerospace Corporation are the Defendants.

  • All were served with a copy of the complaint and summons.

  • The complaint is for: 
    Declaratory Judgment
    Copyright/IP Infringement
    Equitable Relief
    and many more ..

  • On July 17, 2006 Hon. Judge Lew of case CV 96-3065RSWL decline to reside on the case.

  • On August 09, 2006 Hon. Judge Dean D. Pregerson [Judge DDP]  accepted case CV-06-4010-DDP-(JCx)
  • On September 05, 2006 MIT/LL, LLNL, and AERO filed motion_to_dismiss my complaint.
  • On September 06, 2006 Government filed motion_to_dismiss_ my complaint
  • On November 01, 2006 I filed my: Response_in_Opposition to the Defendants Motion to dismiss (Docket # 26)
  • On November 01, 2006 I filed my: Request_For_Judicial_Notice.
  • On December 04, 2006 the ".. United States has conceded the validity of her copyright claim, in fact the Unites States has never conceded, outside of the context of a motion to dismiss that Dr. Schwartz is the author of certain reports, or that the United States owes her money on account of those reports, or on account of an other work. To avoid any doubt, the United States. does not concede authorship, distribution, use, or any other element of copyright liability to Dr. Schwartz." Please read the Government documents grouped in: Request_For_Judicial_Notice. 
  • Order - Case CV-96-4010DDP(JCx) was "Dismissed with prejudice" on 12/15/2006.
  • Notice Of Appeal and Amended Notice Of Appeal filed with the 9th Circuit Court of appeal.
  • 3/13/2007; US COURT OF APPEALS for the Ninth Circuit. "Plaintiff’s Notice Of Motion and Motion with leave of the appellate court to reopen case CV- 06-04010 DDP (JCx) to have lower Court correct its dismissed Order entered on 12/15/2006 to get just relief based on lower Court Oversight and Omission; Mistakes; Inadvertence; Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered Evidence; Fraud, ETC. FRCP 60;"
  • 3/29/2007; Motion to Compel the 9th Circuit  appellate court in appeal 07-55091 to get relief in accordance with its Order dated 3/7/2007. Motion mailed.
  • 4/16/2007: " I am not, and never was a prisoner"
  • 070507-OpeningBrief_Appeal-07-55091. Fraud upon the Court. 
  • 070613 - In Forma Pauperis Status Granted on appeal-0755091. What a sad victory. I would rather have a job.

  • 070706 - US motion for summary Affirmance.pdf, including false declaration under oath. My Answer incorporated the Government's own documents, proving their declaration was false. 070707 - AnswerToUS MotionSummaryAffirmanceExhiit AA-mailed.pdf.  

  • 070723 - MIT LLNL AERO Answer.pdf to my Appeal case 07-55091. Having crocodiles tears.
  • 070801 - My Reply Brief - Mailed.pdf, $700 million dollars per year the Defendants MIT LLNL AERO got for analyzing my complaints. They analyzed it for 18 months. Creating false reports, to cover-up for the fraud National Missile Defense technology and concept they invented during 1979 till today. 
  • 070913 - On September 13, 2007 the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal Grand Government Motion for summary affirmance . Meaning the Government is not a defendant in my court case.  The 9th Cir.  Hon. Judges released the Government from being defendants in my case  D.C. 06-4010 DDP alleging their decision was based on  "A review of the record".  But these 9th Cir. Hon. Judges could not have made such a review because the "RECORD ON APPEAL send to Circuit Court" only three weeks latter on October 4, 2007.
  • 071004 - RECORD ON APPEAL sent to Circuit only on October 4, 2007.... And there was not even one honest Judge in the City of Sedom [Los Angeles] and not in the City of Gemora [San Francisco]