FEDERAL QUI-TAM CASE D.C. 96-3065
Case D.C. 96-3065 RSWL incorporates two types of claims; A qui-Tam
[Whistle Blower] Claim and Wrongful Termination claims; On 2003 after over
seven years of Government Investigations with Investigation cost of over
$200 million dollar and endless unsuccessful efforts to kill the Qui-Tam claim,
the US Government succeeded at last to dismiss the Qui-Tam claim by
Asserting State Secret Privileged. ONLY my Wrongful Termination Claims
stayed. In an effort to prevent me to show to the public in my Wrongful
Termination claims that the technology developed by TRW [currently
Northrop/ Grumman] was false technology that failed to comply with Physics
laws, and that TRW knowingly reported false reports to the Government; The
Government fraudulently classified trial exhibits, killing my possibility to show
the jury what was going on. Even two days prior to Trial in my Wrongful
Termination case the US Government classified additional Trial Exhibit the
second time; It was Trial Exhibit # 117; This to make sure I will NOT win the
case. As a Result of the Government classification fraud the Jury had no
choice but to Judge that Dr. Nira Schwartz was NOT a whistle blower; She
Lost the Wrongful Termination case and had to pay $29,345.15 COST to
TRW.
Please sse case 96-3065 RSWL Complaint The_6th_Amended_Complaint
Hon. Judge Lew recognized the fact that Dr. Nira Schwartz consulted the US
Government in NMD and that her compensation for her work was for the
amount of $1.6 million dollars. The Judge ORDERED to redact that amount
from any Jury awarded that will be in the Wrongful Termination case. Please
see Redact_1.6_million_dollars
What is so classified about Trial Exhibit #117 ? Why it had to be classified
again two days prior to trial? My Answer. This Trial Exhibit is a test procedure
that I created while working in TRW [Currently Northrop/Grumman] along the
Government Technical Requirements document [TRD]. I duplicated it while
consulting the government as a document for the alleged independent
evaluation panel. The Test procedures as provided in Exhibit #117 required
to test the performance of the US NMD Kill Vehicle technology when the
mean temperatures of the deployed objects are Unknown, and rather a
possible wide range of mean temperature can happen. TRW technology
falsely assumed that the mean temperature is given. It can not be given;
because the enemy is heating the deployed objects and the warhead prior to
the deployment of the enemy missile; The enemy is heating the deployed
objects when the enemy launch is on a stand by; This stand by can take
minutes; days; or not at all; We do not know and can not know for how long
this heating, if at all takes place; TRW technologies and Raytheon
technologies failed totally when the deployed objects mean temperatures was
not provided prior to the launch to our missile defense named "Kill Vehicle". I
and TRW employees such as Mr. Wally Beitzel [Chief Engineer], Dr. John
Tang, Dr. Hank Crowder, Mr. Scot Cook, performed tests that showed this
problem. TRW employees concealed from the Government this fact. When I
revealed it to the Government, the DOJ and the ARMY did what ever they
could to silence me, including classification of my reports that were a pure
scientist that are not related to NMD, but show that the entire Concept of US
NMD is false. The US Government classified Dr. John Tang Deposition. It
incorporated the fact that he testified he never read the TRD. In my Wrongful
Termination trial, Mr. Wally Beitzel testified in front of the Jury that Jamieson
Committee reported that the NMD technology that he developed worked. On
June 1995 Jamieson Committee reported NMD technology is Fragile, and
offered to add Frequency analysis to Mr. Beitzel Algorithms. But Mr. Beitzel at
that time knew that the addition Jamison Committee recommended to add to
his technology will not increase robustness, but rather make the technology
even more fragile. Please see Jamieson_Report. GOD Bless America.
Dr. Nira Schwartz Lost the Wrongful Termination claims. The Jury answer to
the first question states that Dr. Nira Schwartz was and is NOT a whistle
Blower. Please see Jury_Judgment
Dr. Nira Schwartz Lost the Wrongful Termination case and had to pay
$29,345.15 COST to TRW [Currently Northrop/Grumman].
But Dr. Schwartz had NOT these kind of monies. She could not find a job;
She had to move to a mobile home and rent her town house to stay alive.
Then she had to sell her town house to pay some bills. The US Government
did NOT pay her Consulting fees for 4,500 hours. She had no choice but to
Stipulated with TRW [currently Northrop/Grumman]; Waiver COST Post Trial
Motions and Appeal. Please see No_Cost_No_Appeal
|
|