Government MIT LLNL Aerospace
...And the Government protects their own and their favorites..and
Copyrights laws are violated ... But MIT LLNL and Aerospace are
above the law ...And above the Constitution...And my complaint was
denied... While these Defendants made use of my Intellectual
Property and Copyrighted reports...Without pay...
On June 26, 2006 I filed a case where the US Government, MIT Lincoln
Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Aerospace
Corporation are the Defendants.
- All were served with a copy of the complaint and summons.
The complaint is for:
Declaratory Judgment
Copyright/IP Infringement
Equitable Relief
and many more ..
- On July 17, 2006 Hon. Judge Lew of case CV 96-3065RSWL decline
to reside on the case.
- On August 09, 2006 Hon. Judge Dean D. Pregerson [Judge DDP]
accepted case CV-06-4010-DDP-(JCx)
- On December 04, 2006 the ".. United States has conceded the
validity of her copyright claim, in fact the Unites States has never
conceded, outside of the context of a motion to dismiss that Dr.
Schwartz is the author of certain reports, or that the United States
owes her money on account of those reports, or on account of an
other work. To avoid any doubt, the United States. does not concede
authorship, distribution, use, or any other element of copyright
liability to Dr. Schwartz." Please read the Government documents
grouped in: Request_For_Judicial_Notice.
- Order - Case CV-96-4010DDP(JCx) was "Dismissed with prejudice"
on 12/15/2006. And the Government protects their own and their
favorites.
- Notice Of Appeal and Amended Notice Of Appeal filed with the 9th
Circuit Court of appeal.
- 3/13/2007; US COURT OF APPEALS for the Ninth Circuit. "Plaintiff’s
Notice Of Motion and Motion with leave of the appellate court to
reopen case CV- 06-04010 DDP (JCx) to have lower Court correct
its dismissed Order entered on 12/15/2006 to get just relief based
on lower Court Oversight and Omission; Mistakes; Inadvertence;
Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered Evidence; Fraud, ETC. FRCP
60;"
- 3/29/2007; Motion to Compel the 9th Circuit appellate court in
appeal 07-55091 to get relief in accordance with its Order dated
3/7/2007. Motion mailed.
- 4/16/2007: " I am not, and never was a prisoner"
- 070507-OpeningBrief_Appeal-07-55091. Fraud upon the Court.
- 070613 - In Forma Pauperis Status Granted on appeal-0755091.
What a sad victory. I would rather have a job.
- 070706 - US motion for summary Affirmance.pdf, including false
declaration under oath. My Answer incorporated the Government's
own documents, proving their declaration was false. 070707 -
AnswerToUS MotionSummaryAffirmanceExhiit AA-mailed.pdf.
- 070723 - MIT LLNL AERO Answer.pdf to my Appeal case 07-55091.
Having crocodiles tears.
- 070801 - My Reply Brief - Mailed.pdf, $700 million dollars per year
the Defendants MIT LLNL AERO got for analyzing my complaints.
They analyzed it for 18 months. Creating false reports, to cover-up
for the fraud National Missile Defense technology and concept they
invented during 1979 till today.
- 070913 - On September 13, 2007 the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal
Grand Government Motion for summary affirmance . Meaning the
Government is not a defendant in my court case. The 9th Cir. Hon.
Judges released the Government from being defendants in my case
D.C. 06-4010 DDP alleging their decision was based on "A review of
the record". But these 9th Cir. Hon. Judges could not have made
such a review because the "RECORD ON APPEAL send to Circuit
Court" only three weeks latter on October 4, 2007.
- 071004 - RECORD ON APPEAL sent to Circuit only on October 4,
2007.... And there was not even one honest Judge in the City of
Sedom [Los Angeles] and not in the City of Gemora [San Francisco]
|
|