|
Home KNDU187 Book KNDU2008 Patent Criminal Reports Jamieson Committee Fragile NMD Technology GAO Reports US Attorney General Case 96-3065 RSWL Physics Laws FBI Letter Consulting US Government Government Corruption Please Help Contact me N. Korea Threat Raytheon CV 01-4937 RSWL Boeing & HOT BACK-UP Raytheon Legal VA MIT/LL False Reports My Reply 05-5063 International Current News Northrop/G. HR Manual 'SSSS' Yellow NAVY - Games US Supreme Court Links Letter to US President Wally Beitzel Deposition Conflict Of Interest ARMY Scope Of Work NMD Contract DASG60-90-C-0165 Ray Maddalone Deposition Roy Danchick Deposition Henry J. Crowder Deposition NMD-My-Copyrights New Warhead Patent Hon. Congressman H. Berman FOIA - refused State Bar Complaint Case D.C. 06-4010 DDP (JCx)
| |
On 2003, my Appeal to the 9th Circuit Case 03-55571
requested that I should be granted the basic rights as a Scientist to prove with
the use of basic physics laws without revealing classified information that Raytheon and TRW [Currently Northrop/Grumman] NMD EKV
technologies,
do not comply with Physics Laws, and therefore forever fragile and will not
protect our Nation especially against North Korea Missile Attack, or any attack.
" The Government
commissioned a panel
to evaluate TRW's discrimination technology. See App. 102
(Government Investigation Report ¶ 21) . The
panel l a t e r issued a report, concluding that a1though
aspects of TRW's discrimination technology appeared t
o to be
"fragile," the technology "did meet the contract requirements[.]"
App. 102 (Government
Investigation Report ¶ 12).
Based on its 33 month investigation and the panel's report,
the Government elected
not to intervene in Schwartz's
qui tam action, - See App. 102 (Government Investigation Report
¶ 16). " Please see Fragile_Technology
-
Questions:
1) Is any one believes that the Government National
Missile Defense specifications and contract requirements allow Fragile
Technologies to protect our Nation against Missile attack? My Answer:
I read the US Government technical requirement Document [TRD]. Non of that
is allowed.
2) If the Technologies are "Fragile" why
they are going into production? My Answer: Because we do NOT have a
US Government or Department of Justice to protect our Nation interest, we
have Government agencies such as the ARMY that put personal interest prior
to the interest of the Nation.
3) Who are the "Government
commissioned a panel"? My Answer: The alleged independent
commissioned panel is Massachusetts Institute of Technology [MIT] and Lawrence
Livermore [LL] Laboratory. The same MIT that invented the
"Fragile" NMD technologies, and the same institutes that receives
till today over $700 million dollars per years to validate their own false
technologies. Please see Letter by Pauline Waschek a TRW
[Currently Northrop/Grumman] Attorney to DOJ Attorney Dennis Egan Dated
False-Technology Letter_to_DOJ
-
I am waiting for the Ruling on
my Appeal to the 9th Circuit and will inform you the outcome.
|