FRAGILE_NATIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE [NMD] TECHNOLOGY
On 2003, my Appeal to the 9th Circuit Case 03-55571 requested that I
should be granted the basic rights as a Scientist to prove with the use of
basic physics laws without revealing classified information that Raytheon
and TRW [Currently Northrop/Grumman] NMD EKV technologies, do not
comply with Physics Laws, and therefore forever fragile and will not
protect our Nation especially against North Korea Missile Attack, or any
attack.
US Government DOJ Attorney Tara Leiah Grove in the Brief for Appellee
United States of America, stated that:
" The Government commissioned a panel to evaluate TRW's
discrimination technology. See App. 102 (Government Investigation
Report ¶ 21) . The panel later issued a report, concluding that although
aspects of TRW's discrimination technology appeared t o to be "fragile,"
the technology "did meet the contract requirements[.]" App. 102
(Government Investigation Report ¶ 12). Based on its 33 month
investigation and the panel's report, the Government elected not to
intervene in Schwartz's qui tam action, - See App. 102 (Government
Investigation Report ¶ 16). " Please see Fragile_Technology
Questions:
1) Is any one believes that the Government National Missile Defense
specifications and contract requirements allow Fragile Technologies to
protect our Nation against Missile attack? My Answer: I read the US
Government technical requirement Document [TRD]. Non of that is
allowed.
2) If the Technologies are "Fragile" why they are going into
production? My Answer: Because we do NOT have a US Government or
Department of Justice to protect our Nation interest, we have
Government agencies such as the ARMY that put personal interest prior
to the interest of the Nation.
3) Who are the "Government commissioned a panel"? My Answer: The
alleged independent commissioned panel is Massachusetts Institute of
Technology [MIT] and Lawrence Livermore [LL] Laboratory. The same
MIT that invented the "Fragile" NMD technologies, and the same
institutes that receives till today over $700 million dollars per years to
validate their own false technologies. Please see Letter by Pauline
Waschek a TRW [Currently Northrop/Grumman] Attorney to DOJ
Attorney Dennis Egan Dated False-Technology Letter_to_DOJ
I am waiting for the Ruling on my Appeal to the 9th Circuit and will inform
you the outcome. [My request was denied]
|
|