NAVY GAMES
...And the ill technology concept invented by MIT on 1979 to allege
protect the US against Nuclear Missile Defense [NMD] was embedded in
our entire military, including my beloved NAVY...the same NAVY that
financed my project Ph.D....
The Navy makes the Nation believes that the nuclear submarines it
placed across North Korea [N. Korea] is an adequate protection against
N. Korea nuclear missile attack. It is NOT, and cannot be a defense for
my Nation. The US submarines placed across N. Korea are for the
purpose of attacking N. Korea. The Navy refusal to accept my complaint
will not make their technology with the capabilities to stop N. Korea
nuclear missile attack as they allege. There is NO such a thing defense
against Nuclear attack. President Obama instructions to develop such
technology is hollowed. President Obama, there is another way to go...

  • N. Korea launched several long rang missiles, but the US Navy
    submarines did not even make any attempt to intercept with them.
    Why? Because the Navy does not have such capabilities, and no
    interest to present lack of capabilities. And the most important is
    that even if the Navy had such a capability [which they do not and
    cannot], an interception with nuclear missile will cause nuclear
    debris over S. Korea, Japan, and more...

  • On June 18, 2005 I filed by Email with the NAVY IG [Inspector
    General] a complaint. I have provided www.NiraSchwartz.com as
    the documents and material I based my complaint on. The
    Complaint was assigned ID # 20050489. US Captain M. L. FAIR
    cherry picked excuses, to reject my complaint. My questions to US
    Captain M. L. FAIR are:

  • 1.   You refuse to read my website. If you did not read my website,
    based on what you say that I have not specified allegations for you
    to review?

  • 2.  If you did read my website, then why you hint that my website is
    only about "National Policy" and "National military strategy"?

  • 3.  If you claim that you do "investigate, or inquire into any and all
    matters of importance to the Department of the Navy", then why
    you decline my complaint? Is the Navy failure to protect us against
    warhead attack especially tumblers is NOT an importance to the
    Navy?

  • 4.  Why you cherry picked reasons to decline my complaint, when
    you said that "National Policy" is NOT your interest? Are these
    Cherry picks to reject my complaint not making you a part of
    "National Policy" that you say you are not?

  • 5. Do you know that Dr. Frank Handler refused to test NMD/EKV
    technology against the TRD? Well you are NOT the first one that
    refuse to do that. And not the first one that continued to get your
    salary...

  • On June 28, 2005 surprisingly US Captain M. L. FAIR  responded
    with a letter attached by Email and addressed to me that stated:
    "you have not identified a specific allegation for our office to
    review". He advised me to review his website.

  • On July 14, 2005 I responded to Captain M. L. FAIR that my
    website incorporates the fact that:  
    " I have personally informed the Navy during the year 2000, in
    front of GAO Investigator Mr. Ghoshroy while at MIT, that the NMD
    EKV technology is Fraud and false technology that will not comply
    with the laws of physics and will never work;

  • And what is the Navy response? No one even cares to read my
    web site; The False technology goes into production; and the
    government lies to the people that we are protected against
    atomic attack [especially Tumbler from N. Korea] while using the
    NMD EKV technology;

  • Please be advised that I have seven CD's with additional
    documents that prove my complaint. Let me know if you wish to
    have them.

  • For your responsibility for secured America, and secured Navy
    forces, please read my web site instead of brushing me away;"


  • On July 20, 2005 the NAVY  NAVY Emailed me"

  • "Please refer to our website at www.ig.navy.mil regarding the
    appropriate process on how to prepare a complaint for submission
    to our office."

  • On July 21, 2005 I responded with an Email:

  • "Believe me when N. Korea launch a missile, and/or China, and/or
    other countries, especially a tumbler war head, on Navy forces
    [where ever they are] you are NOT protected, and you are running
    of time, and you are playing games with me.

  • The enemy identified in the NMD EKV TRD are having warheads
    with shape, material, reflector and more that can be changed in
    three months, and your response time to these changes is over
    1.5 years. So please, no more games, go and assure strong
    America.

  • God Bless America."

  • On July 25, 2005 by a letter attached to an Email; the NAVY IG
    [Inspector General] by US Captain M. L. FAIR rejected my
    complaint.

  • My Ph.D. thesis [1979] was financed by the Bi-National founds; the
    US NAVY/Israel. The Navy I knew was honest, and cared for
    America and for America's friends.
Home
Northrop_HR_Manual
NCO_and_Debt_Collectors
President_Obama
Warhead_Patent
KNDU187_Book
SA_Sam_Reed_Reports
Jamieson_Committee
Fragile_NMD_Technology
GAO_Reports
US_Attorney_General
Case_96-3065_RSWL
Physics_Laws
FBI_Letter
Consulting_US_Government
Government_Corruption
Please_Help
North_Korea_Threat
Raytheon_CV_01-4937_RSWL
Boeing_and_HOT_BACK-UP
Raytheon_Legal_VA
MIT_and_LL_False_Reports
My_Reply_05-5063
Current_News
SSSS_Yellow
NAVY_Games
US_Supreme_Court
Links
Letters_to_US_President
Wally_Beitzel_Deposition
Conflict_Of_Interest
ARMY_Scope_Of_Work
NMD_Contract_DASG60-90-C-0165
Ray_Maddalone_Deposition
Roy_Danchick_Deposition
Henry J. Crowder Deposition
NMD_My_Copyrights
Hon_Congressman_H_Berman
FOIA_refused
State Bar Complaint
Case_DC_06-4010_DDP
northrop_g__hr_manual