Home
Northrop_HR_Manual
NCO_and_Debt_Collectors
President_Obama
Warhead_Patent
KNDU187_Book
SA_Sam_Reed_Reports
Jamieson_Committee
Fragile_NMD_Technology
GAO_Reports
US_Attorney_General
Case_96-3065_RSWL
Physics_Laws
FBI_Letter
Consulting_US_Government
Government_Corruption
Please_Help
North_Korea_Threat
Raytheon_CV_01-4937_RSWL
Boeing_and_HOT_BACK-UP
Raytheon_Legal_VA
MIT_and_LL_False_Reports
My_Reply_05-5063
Current_News
SSSS_Yellow
NAVY_Games
US_Supreme_Court
Links
Letters_to_US_President
Wally_Beitzel_Deposition
Conflict_Of_Interest
ARMY_Scope_Of_Work
NMD_Contract_DASG60-90-C-0165
Ray_Maddalone_Deposition
Roy_Danchick_Deposition
Henry J. Crowder Deposition
NMD_My_Copyrights
Hon_Congressman_H_Berman
FOIA_refused
State Bar Complaint
Case_DC_06-4010_DDP
northrop_g__hr_manual
Special Agent [SA] Sam Reed Investigation Reports

On National Missile Defense [NMD] Corruption and False
Technologies at Defense Criminal Investigation Service
[DCIS] located in Orange County California during 1996 -
1999.

Investigation milestones:

On April 29, 1996 Dr. Nira Schwartz filed a court case in
D.C. Federal Court in Los Angeles California. Case #
96-3065 RSWL.

The Court case is named Schwartz vs. TRW [Currently
known as Northrop/Grumman Inc]. It is a Whistle blower
case. In this case Dr. Schwartz stated that US NMD as
developed by TRW [Currently known as Northrop/Grumman
Inc] does not work and will not work. The technology will not
comply with Physics laws.

This Whistle Blower court case was filed by Dr. Nira
Schwartz on behalf of the US Government.

The Government by its Department of Justice [DOJ] can
elect to intervene in the case and carry it to justice, or it can
decline to intervene in the case, leaving it to the Relator [Dr.
Nira Schwartz in this case] to carry the case load to Justice.

During 1996 till 1999 SA Reed at DCIS  was appointed by
his boss the Inspector General, to investigate Dr. Nira
Schwartz Complaint that NMD was a false technology that
does not work and will not work.

Government Agencies such as the ARMY sabotaged SA
Reed Investigation Refused to read his reports.

On August 31, 1999 SA Reed
Reported that on 2-26-99:  

" 13.  On February 26, 1999, LtCol. John B. Hoffman, United
States Army Legal Services, Arlington, VA, provided a letter
to the DOJ, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division,
Washington, D.C. LtCol. Hoffman states in the letter that,
"Based upon conversations with Mr. Dennis Egan, the
investigators handling this case and our review of the facts,
we recommend against intervening in this case. The
relator's request that the government not intervene, while
not determinative, was also considered as a factor in making
this recommendation."

Please see page=6 of SA Reed
Reports.

and on March 15, 1999 SA Reed was quick to response that:

"   On March 8, 1999, Department of Justice (DOJ) Attorney
Dennis Egan faxed reporting agent a copy of a letter from
the Department of the Army, United States Army Legal
Services Agency, Arlington, VA. The litter is addressed to
Mr. Michael F. Hertz, head of the Commercial Litigation
Branch, Civil Division, DOJ Washington, D.C. The letter is
dated February 26, 1999, and recommends against, DOJ
intervening in this case. One of the reasons for not
intervening was based upon conversations with the
investigators handling the case. This statement has no
factual basis as reporting agent is the only investigator
assigned to the case, and has not spoken with any Army
representative regarding not intervening in the case "

Please see page=14 of SA Reed Reports   

In that letter SA Sam Reed refused to take part in the DOJ
and the US Army corruption and was was forced to retire
shortly after he was appointed a Group Manager in DCIS. A
job position that SA Reed told me was the dream of his life.  

The Government prohibited SA REED from testifying in any
of my court cases and/or talk to me. All my efforts to legally
subpoena SA Reed as a witness were denied by the US
Government.  

I never requested that the Government will not intervene in
my cases. On the contrary I wrote many letters requesting
that it will intervene in the case. Please see  http:Please see
page=34 of SA Reed Reports.