|
Home
KNDU187 Book
KNDU2008 Patent
Criminal Reports
Jamieson Committee
Fragile NMD Technology
GAO Reports
US Attorney General
Case 96-3065 RSWL
Physics Laws
FBI Letter
Consulting US Government
Government Corruption
Please Help
Contact me
N. Korea Threat
Raytheon CV 01-4937 RSWL
Boeing & HOT BACK-UP
Raytheon Legal VA
MIT/LL False Reports
My Reply 05-5063
International
Current News
Northrop/G. HR Manual
'SSSS' Yellow
NAVY - Games
US Supreme Court
Links
Letter to US President
Wally Beitzel Deposition
Conflict Of Interest
ARMY Scope Of Work
NMD Contract DASG60-90-C-0165
Ray Maddalone Deposition
Roy Danchick Deposition
Henry J. Crowder Deposition
NMD-My-Copyrights
New Warhead Patent
Hon. Congressman H. Berman
FOIA - refused
State Bar Complaint
Case D.C. 06-4010 DDP (JCx)
| |
Case D.C. 96-3065 RSWL incorporates two types of claims; A
qui-Tam [Whistle Blower] Claim and Wrongful Termination claims; On 2003 after
over seven years of Government Investigations with Investigation cost of over
$200 million dollar and endless unsuccessful efforts to kill the Qui-Tam claim,
the US Government succeeded at last to dismiss the Qui-Tam claim by Asserting State
Secret Privileged. ONLY my Wrongful Termination Claims stayed. In an
effort to prevent me to show to the public in my Wrongful Termination claims
that the technology developed by TRW [currently Northrop/ Grumman] was false
technology that failed to comply with Physics laws, and that TRW knowingly
reported false reports to the Government; The Government fraudulently classified
trial exhibits, killing my possibility to show the jury what was going on.
Even two
days prior to Trial in my Wrongful Termination case the US Government classified
additional Trial Exhibit the second time; It was Trial Exhibit # 117; This to make sure I will NOT
win the case. As a Result of the
Government classification fraud the Jury had no choice but to Judge that Dr. Nira Schwartz was
NOT a whistle blower; She Lost the Wrongful Termination case and had to
pay $29,345.15 COST to TRW.
- Please se case 96-3065 RSWL Complaint The_6th_Amended_Complaint
- Hon. Judge Lew recognized the fact that Dr. Nira Schwartz consulted the US
Government in NMD and that her compensation for her work was for the amount of $1.6
million dollars. The Judge ORDERED to redact that amount from any Jury awarded
that will be in the Wrongful Termination case. Please see Redact_$1.6_million_dollars
- What is so classified about Trial Exhibit #117 ? Why it had to
be classified again two days prior to trial? My Answer. This Trial Exhibit is a
test procedure that I created while working in TRW [Currently
Northrop/Grumman] along the Government Technical Requirements document [TRD].
I duplicated it while consulting the government as a document for the alleged
independent evaluation panel. The Test procedures as provided in Exhibit #117
required to test the performance of the US NMD Kill Vehicle technology when
the mean temperatures of the deployed objects are Unknown, and rather a
possible wide range of mean temperature can happen. TRW technology falsely
assumed that the mean temperature is given. It can not be given;
because the enemy is heating the deployed objects and the warhead prior to
the deployment of the enemy missile; The enemy is heating the deployed
objects when the enemy launch is on a stand by; This stand by can take
minutes; days; or not at all; We do
not know and can not know for how long this heating, if at all takes place; TRW technologies and Raytheon technologies failed totally when
the deployed objects mean temperatures was not provided prior to the launch
to our
missile defense named "Kill Vehicle". I and TRW employees such as
Mr. Wally Beitzel [Chief Engineer], Dr. John Tang, Dr. Hank Crowder, Mr.
Scot Cook, performed tests that showed this problem. TRW employees concealed from the
Government this fact. When I revealed it to the Government, the DOJ and the
ARMY did what ever they could to silence me, including classification of my
reports that were a pure scientist that are not related to NMD, but show
that the entire Concept of US NMD is false. The US
Government classified Dr. John Tang Deposition. It incorporated the fact
that he testified he never read the TRD. In my Wrongful Termination trial, Mr. Wally Beitzel testified in
front of the Jury that Jamieson Committee reported that the NMD technology
that he developed worked. On June 1995 Jamieson Committee reported NMD
technology is Fragile, and offered to add Frequency analysis to Mr. Beitzel
Algorithms. But Mr. Beitzel at that time knew that the addition Jamison Committee
recommended to add to his technology will not increase robustness, but
rather make the technology even more fragile. Please see Jamieson_Report. GOD Bless America.
- Dr. Nira Schwartz Lost the Wrongful Termination claims. The Jury answer to
the first question states that Dr. Nira Schwartz was and is NOT a whistle
Blower. Please see Jury_Judgment
- Dr. Nira Schwartz Lost the Wrongful Termination case and had to
pay $29,345.15 COST to TRW [Currently Northrop/Grumman].
- But Dr. Schwartz had NOT these kind of monies. She could not find a job;
She had to move to a mobile home and rent her town house to stay alive. Then
she had to sell her town house to pay some bills. The US Government did NOT
pay her Consulting fees for 4,500 hours. She had no choice but to Stipulated
with TRW [currently Northrop/Grumman]; Waiver COST Post Trial Motions and Appeal.
Please see No_Cost_No_Appeal
|