-
Please see MyResume
-
On 1997 it became clear that
DOJ has enough evidence to take TRW [currently Northrop Grumman] to court
for knowingly concealing from the Government that NMD EKV technology to
select the enemy warheads out of the decoys launched on the US was not
working, and produced reports to the Government concealing that fact.
-
At that time DOJ Attorney
Dennis Egan promised Dr. Nira Schwartz that the Government will intervene in
her qui-tam case and take it to trial. Attorney Egan also retained Dr.
Schwartz services to consult the ARMY and the US Government in the
tests/validation/analysis of the entire NMD. The agreement we verbal and as
a result Dr. Schwartz consulted the Government for for over 4500 hours and
created over 13 reports which the US Government made use of them. During her
three years of consulting Dr. Schwartz had access to the performance reports
and tests of NMD technologies that were produced by TRW currently
Northrop/Grumman] and Raytheon.
-
On late 1999 Attorney Egan
informed Dr. Schwartz that the Government is NOT going to intervene in her
Qui-Tam case. That the Government has the right to change the agreement
between the parties.
-
Hon. Judge Lew believed Dr.
Nira Schwartz that there was an agreement, and that she consulted the US
Government for the amount of $1.6 million dollars. Hon. Judge Lew ORDERED to
redact that amount of money from any future award that she may get in her Wrongful
Termination case. After all the Judge explained, Dr. Schwartz can not ask
TRW for that loss of income when she worked consulted the US Government.
See Redact_$1.6_million_dollars
-
But the US Government refused
to pay Dr. Schwartz for her consulting work the amount of $1.6 million
dollars for three years of work and 13 reports of intellectual property; that
while keeping paying $700 million dollars to MIT/LL per year to be
"Independent Evaluators", when they were the inventors of the
false concept, and their reports were a white wash to keep getting $700
million dollars per year. SA Sam Reed stated that MIT/LL can not be independent
evaluators and that this is a Fraud by itself. SA Reed requested that Sandia
will do the Independent evaluation of NMD EKV. But the ARMY objected knowing
that if the evaluation will go to a trure independent evaluator [Such as
Prof. Postol] the truth will be reported the second time, and not just by
Dr. Schwartz.
-
The Government refused to pay
Dr. Schwartz, knowing that by doing it she will be able to carry her Qui-Tam
case to trial without the help of the Government.
-
Dr. Schwartz took the US to
Washington Court of Claims. Asking to be paid, and to incorporate Hon. Judge
Lew Redact_$1.6_million_dollars.
This case is known as case 03-37C Judge Bush..
-
Judge Bush was aware of the
Jury decision in case 96-3065 that Dr. Schwartz was NOT a whistle blower.
Please see Jury_Judgment.
Judge Bush was aware of Hon. Judge Lew Order Redact_$1.6_million_dollars.
But she issued an order of her own dismissing the case alleging that Dr.
Schwartz was a whistle blower and therefore was NOT entitled to be paid for
her consulting work. Judge Bush even went and corrected the US Government
Motion to dismiss, to assure dismissal of Dr. Schwartz complaint. Please see
Dismissing_03-37C
Washington
-
Dr. Nira Schwartz appealed the
dismissal of Washington Court of Claims case 03-37C. Please see Appeal_05-5063
-
Please see Invoices_To_The_Government that
I mailed on a regular basis.
-
I will put case 03-37C and its
Appeal 05-5063 on the Internet shortly.
-
I will update the public with
the outcome of that Appeal. Which very likely will continue to the Supreme
court in Washington. And for that I kindly ask for your donations.