CONSULTING THE US GOVERNMENT
I am Dr. Nira Schwartz; I have dual Citizenship; I was Naturalized in 1989
as a US citizen; I was born in Israel in 1946; In 1979 I received a Ph.D.
degree from Tel Aviv University in the filed of Engineering, Physics and
Mathematics. I am the inventor of 26 US patents.
My expertise is in Testing/Analysis/Validation/ Simulation of large systems.
I have worked as a consultant to the US Government for over 4500 hours.
Created over 13 reports of recommendation/evaluation and analysis of NMD
EKV. The US Government made use of my intellectual property and refuse
to pay me for my work along the agreement made.
Please see MyResume
On 1997 it became clear that DOJ has enough evidence to take TRW
[currently Northrop Grumman] to court for knowingly concealing from the
Government that NMD EKV technology to select the enemy warheads out
of the decoys launched on the US was not working, and produced reports to
the Government concealing that fact.
At that time DOJ Attorney Dennis Egan promised Dr. Nira Schwartz that the
Government will intervene in her qui-tam case and take it to trial. Attorney
Egan also retained Dr. Schwartz services to consult the ARMY and the US
Government in the tests/validation/analysis of the entire NMD. The
agreement we verbal and as a result Dr. Schwartz consulted the Government
for for over 4500 hours and created over 13 reports which the US
Government made use of them. During her three years of consulting Dr.
Schwartz had access to the performance reports and tests of NMD
technologies that were produced by TRW currently Northrop/Grumman] and
Raytheon.
On late 1999 Attorney Egan informed Dr. Schwartz that the Government is
NOT going to intervene in her Qui-Tam case. That the Government has the
right to change the agreement between the parties.
Hon. Judge Lew believed Dr. Nira Schwartz that there was an agreement,
and that she consulted the US Government for the amount of $1.6 million
dollars. Hon. Judge Lew ORDERED to redact that amount of money from
any future award that she may get in her Wrongful Termination case. After all
the Judge explained, Dr. Schwartz can not ask TRW for that loss of income
when she worked consulted the US Government. See
Redact_$1.6_million_dollars
But the US Government refused to pay Dr. Schwartz for her consulting work
the amount of $1.6 million dollars for three years of work and 13 reports of
intellectual property; that while keeping paying $700 million dollars to
MIT/LL per year to be "Independent Evaluators", when they were the
inventors of the false concept, and their reports were a white wash to keep
getting $700 million dollars per year. SA Sam Reed stated that MIT/LL can
not be independent evaluators and that this is a Fraud by itself. SA Reed
requested that Sandia will do the Independent evaluation of NMD EKV. But
the ARMY objected knowing that if the evaluation will go to a trure
independent evaluator [Such as Prof. Postol] the truth will be reported the
second time, and not just by Dr. Schwartz.
The Government refused to pay Dr. Schwartz, knowing that by doing it she
will be able to carry her Qui-Tam case to trial without the help of the
Government.
Dr. Schwartz took the US to Washington Court of Claims. Asking to be
paid, and to incorporate Hon. Judge Lew Redact_$1.6_million_dollars. This
case is known as case 03-37C Judge Bush..
Judge Bush was aware of the Jury decision in case 96-3065 that Dr.
Schwartz was NOT a whistle blower. Please see Jury_Judgment. Judge
Bush was aware of Hon. Judge Lew Order Redact_$1.6_million_dollars.
But she issued an order of her own dismissing the case alleging that Dr.
Schwartz was a whistle blower and therefore was NOT entitled to be paid
for her consulting work. Judge Bush even went and corrected the US
Government Motion to dismiss, to assure dismissal of Dr. Schwartz
complaint. Please see Dismissing_03-37C Washington
Dr. Nira Schwartz appealed the dismissal of Washington Court of Claims
case 03-37C. Please see Appeal_05-5063
Please see Invoices_To_The_Government that I mailed on a regular basis.
I will put case 03-37C and its Appeal 05-5063 on the Internet shortly.
I will update the public with the outcome of that Appeal. Which very likely
will continue to the Supreme court in Washington. And for that I kindly ask
for your donations.
|
|