|
Home
KNDU187 Book
KNDU2008 Patent
Criminal Reports
Jamieson Committee
Fragile NMD Technology
GAO Reports
US Attorney General
Case 96-3065 RSWL
Physics Laws
FBI Letter
Consulting US Government
Government Corruption
Please Help
Contact me
N. Korea Threat
Raytheon CV 01-4937 RSWL
Boeing & HOT BACK-UP
Raytheon Legal VA
MIT/LL False Reports
My Reply 05-5063
International
Current News
Northrop/G. HR Manual
'SSSS' Yellow
NAVY - Games
US Supreme Court
Links
Letter to US President
Wally Beitzel Deposition
Conflict Of Interest
ARMY Scope Of Work
NMD Contract DASG60-90-C-0165
Ray Maddalone Deposition
Roy Danchick Deposition
Henry J. Crowder Deposition
NMD-My-Copyrights
New Warhead Patent
Hon. Congressman H. Berman
FOIA - refused
State Bar Complaint
Case D.C. 06-4010 DDP (JCx)
| |
On May 1998 the following persons: M-J.
Tsai and Charles Meins at MIT Lincoln Laboratory; Larry Ng and Frank Handler at
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [LL]; and Glenn Light at Aerospace
Corporation [AC]; issue a report titled:
" Independent Review of TRW Discrimination Techniques Final Report"
[This group of MIT/LL/AS is also addressed as the POET [Phase One Engineering
Team]
This alleged "Independent Review" was in effect a white wash created
by the ARMY/DOJ; MIT/LL where the inventors of the NMD/EKV concept, and in
effect evaluating themselves; far away from being independent reviewers; Mr. Glenn
Light had many common projects with TRW, and with Mr. Robert Hughes my Boss at
TRW [currently Northrop/Grumman] during 1995-6.
The Poet Team [MIT/LL/AC] had created Tests procedures to validate the
performance of the NMD/EKV technologies. Their May 1998 Independent report was
based on their own test procedures, that failed to test the performance against
the Government Technical Requirement Document [TRD].
While the TRD specifically states that KEY parameters and their mean are not accurately
known, but rather a wide range of possible values, the Poet ignored that, in
order to falsely present success identification of the warheads.
The Inspector General/Defense Criminal Investigator Service [IG-DCIS] SA Sam
Reed informed in writing the Poet that they need to perform their Test/Validations against
the Government TRD.
The Poet responded in a letter dated June 10, 1998 to Mr. Keith Englander at Ballistic
Missile Defense Organization [BMDO] a division of the ARMY, stating that they
will NOT Test/Validate NMD/EKV technology against the TRD. The
response was made in writing by Dr. Frank Handler at Laurence Livermore National
Laboratory [LL].
Mr. Keith Englander and the ARMY knowingly left the Poet to do what ever they
wanted. Including reporting false excellent NMD/EKV technologies performance, to
the Congress and the Senate; With no one controlling them.
There is NO Government, NO DOJ, No IG-DCIS, and NO GAO investigators to control
the Poet. No Laws and NO Constitution.
SA Sam Reed fought very hard to prevent the whitewash and the Fraud Report the Poet committed;
His endless efforts contributed to the cancel of his contract with DCIS and his alleged
retirement.
-
MIT/LL were the inventors of the NMD/EKV concept, and therefore could
not be Independent Reviewers. Please see Letter_to_DOJ.
They were carefully selected by the ARMY despite SA Reed's at DCIS objections.
Till today, MIT/LL receive over $700 million dollars per year to be independent evaluators of
their own technologies.
-
MIT/LL/AS to
assure the receiving of river of money reported that the NMD EKV concept as
implemented by TRW [currently Northrop/Grumman] and also by Raytheon:
" ..are well designed and work
properly, with only some refinement or redesign required to increase the
robustness of the overall discrimination function."
Please see MIT/LL_
Independant_Report.
-
But few paragraph latter in
this alleged Independent Report MIT/LL/AC
stated a generic statement, that is free of
any implementation mathematical tools. This generic statement is applicable to TRW [currently Nortrop/Grumman] and
or Raytheon implementation technologies of the NMD/EKV concept; both companies had to comply with the same TRD dated
September 1993, and the same TRD versions after of it; This
generic statement of MIT/LL/AC say:
" Reliable prior knowledge on
many of the threat types included in
the TRD cannot be obtained."
Please see MIT/LL_Independent_Report_(2)
-
How Many of threat types in the
TRD a reliable prior knowledge is not available? Was it reported by
MIT/LL/AC? Is there always a non-reliable knowledge that is common to all of the
threat types? Is the deployed objects mean temperature one of them? How it is impacting the ability to
differentiate the warhead from the rest of the objects deployed? How this
lack of parameters values [and not just the objects temperatures] impact the
validity performance of the NMD/EKV concept? How this lack of accurate knowledge
of KEY values impact cluster selection? Is any of the GAO Investigators can
assure the Nation that the NMD/EKV concept is robust when prior knowledge of
KEY parameters is always not available and/or reliable? What
about material emissivity? Is it a KEY parameter? What happens to its value
when a blue balloon is suddenly replaced by a white and/or black balloon?
What happen to KEY parameters values when nuclear spikes are on the Infra
Red signals? Is there a different between nuclear spikes and earthshine
spikes on the Infra Red signal? Is it possible to clean the spikes out of
the Infra Red signals ? Can the GAO Investigators can
assure the Nation that the they check the delay created by cleaning the
spikes and what the value of the delay in compare to End of Game time? What
does it all mean for the NMD/EKV concept? How does it impact the NMD/EKV
technologies performance of Raytheon / TRW [currently Northrop/Grumman] ?
-
Poet refused to perform
Test/Validation of NMD/EKV against the TRD. Please see
Poet_Refuse_Frank_Handler and Poet_Refuse_TRD
-
GAO
Investigators, how you can sleep at night with the whitewash reports you created?
You failed to Test/Validate the NMD/EKV concept and implementing
technologies against the laws of physics and against the TRD. Your reports allow the NMD/EKV false concept and false implementations
technologies to go production.
-
And while
KEY parameters values are not available and always not reliable, MIT/LL/AC
were quick to report that the NMD EKV TRW [currently Northrop/Grumman] and
Raytheon technologies "work properly"... and the river of money
keeps coming .....and the false technologies go to production ... and
the Nation security is in danger...
-
I have reported to the
Government over 250 issues and catastrophe in the MIT/LL/AC reports to why the NMD EKV concept
and its implemention technologies are false, non robust
and in non-compliance with the laws of physics. That the Nation security is
in danger if Raytheon and/or TRW [currently Northrop/Grumman] go production.
My report was
classified.
-
GOD Save
America.
Please Help and Donate money to carry these cases to the Supreme Court in
Washington. Because this is the ONLY way to remove these false technologies
from protecting the Nation.
|