-
Please see Trial Exhibit_31-2
of case 96-3065 RSWL
-
Tumbler warhead is an objects
that its motion in space are not predicted. Such motion can be easily achieved,
by attaching to the warhead some rods and/or balloons that leek air, and
many more.
-
On 1996 Mr. Wally Beitzel
[Chief engineer at TRW (currently Northrop/Grumman)] false reported to the
Government that TRW technology is robust and can differentiate from other
decoys the Tumbler
warhead, even when it tumbles slowly. Mr. Beitzel even reported that a
change of 0.5 degree in warhead conning angle caused degradation of 5%
in the probability to detect the warhead. I responded in written
report to GAO/DCIS/DOJ
that this is one of the indications that the NMD EKV Technology concept is
false; forever fragile; in noncompliance with the laws of physics;
-
What will
happen when a Tumbler is having a change of 1 degree in conning angle? 2 degree? and so
on. My report explained by laws of physics and mathematical tools that the
technology concept fails under these conditions. My report was classified.
-
Where these conditions identified
in the Government TRD?
-
Did the GAO investigators read
the Government TRD?
-
But the GAO investigators did
not want the proof that the NMD EKV concept is false; forever fragile; and in
noncompliance with the laws of physics; They ONLY were looking for
problems that they believed can be solved. They knew that if they will
report that NMD EKV concept is false they will lose their jobs and their
pensions. That they will end as happened to SA Sam Reed.
-
Can GAO investigators assure
the Nation that there will be no earthshine Spikes on the Infrared Signal to
drastically impact the signal average? Where these conditions identified
in the Government TRD?
-
Can GAO investigators assure
the Nation that spectrum analysis of Infra red signals with earthshine Spikes
will provide
characteristic and unique frequency to differentiate the warhead?
-
Can GAO investigators assure
the Nation that the exact mean temperatures of the deployed
objects is known prior to enemy launch?
-
Can GAO investigators assure
the Nation that the NMD EKV sensor will not look at multiple potential warheads
creating Infrared signals gaps?
-
Can GAO investigators assure
the Nation that the deployed objects clusters are selected when the differentiation
performance of Raytheon technology is above 70%, or 80%, or 90%?
-
Can GAO investigators assure
the Nation that the enemy will not switch deployed objects colors in 20
minutes?
-
Can GAO investigators explain
to the Nation what does it mean that to build a new threat's body takes 3
months and the NMD EKV technologies response time is over 1.5 years?
-
Can GAO investigators assure
the Nation that they read the CIA reports?
-
Can GAO investigators assure
the Nation that sending multiple NMD EKV to the deployed objects will cause
them to aim on the
warheads? After all the false
technology is imbedded in all of them.
-
Can GAO investigators assure
the Nation that the during the End of Game time the Enemy warhead will not
move over half of his body size, causing miss hit, regardless of any type of
discrimination technology? My calculations/simulations with basic laws of
physics show that the warhead does just that. I produced these
analysis reports in writing to the TRW/Raytheon/DCIS/DOJ/GAO/POET/NRC/BMDO/ARMY.
-
Can GAO investigators explain
to the Nation why NMD EKV GBI refused to read SA Reed Reports?
-
Can GAO investigators assure
the Nation that the Independent panel to evaluate the NMD EKV technology was
indeed Independent?
-
Can GAO investigators explain
to the Nation why the Inventors of the false NMD EKV Concept on 1979 and known as
MIT/LL are also performing the
task of alleged "Independent evaluators" and in fact
evaluate themselves? and who appointed them to the task?
-
Can GAO investigators explain
to the Nation why SA Sam Reed request to have Sandia do the Independent evaluation was
denied, and by whom?
-
Can GAO investigators explain
to the Nation why TRW [Currently Northrop/Grumman] was the developer of the
NMD EKV technology and also the SYSTEM ENGINEER, and in fact evaluate
themselves?
-
Can GAO investigators explain
to the Nation why their reports failed to address the fact that the NMD EKV
concept was in non compliance with laws of physics?
-
Can GAO investigators explain
to the Nation why DOJ based on lies failed to intervene in my Qui-Tam case?
And why the Attorney General was not even aware that the qui-tam cases were
dismissed?
-
Can GAO investigators explain
to the Nation why the US Government and DOJ breached the promises it gave to
me to intervene in my qui-tam case 96-3065 RSWL?
-
Can GAO investigators explain
to the Nation why the US Government prohibit SA Sam Reed from testifying
about the intervention agreement that he witness and was made in my home on
1997 between DOJ Attorney Dennis Egan and me that the US Government will
intervene in my qui-tam case?
-
Can GAO investigators explain
to the Nation why DOJ is fighting me at the Washington Court of claims NOT
to pay me for my consulting fees of over 4500 hours? This when Hon. Judge
Lew issue an Order recognizing my work for the value of $1.6 million
dollars, and ordered that amount be redacted from any award by the Jury in
the Wrongful Termination Case?
-
Can GAO investigators explain
to the Nation why DOJ/BMDO/ARMY entered into an agreement with TRW
[currently Northrop/Grumman] that if TRW will win my Wrongful Termination
case [claims in case 96-3065 RSWL] the Government will pay TRW attorneys fees and
Cost? [Hon. Judge Chapman]
-
Can GAO investigators explain
to the Nation why DOJ and the ARMY unnecessarily classified Trial Exhibit to
prevent me from wining my wrongful - termination case [Claims incorporated
in case 96-3065 RSWL]?
-
Can GAO investigators explain
to the Nation why DOJ and the ARMY unnecessarily classified Trial Exhibit to
prevent me from showing these agencies violation of law?
-
Non of that GAO investigators
can assure and/or explain that to the Nation. The GAO Investigators knew about these unsolvable problems,
violation of laws made by the ARMY and by DOJ and
knowingly failed to report that to the Congress and to the Senate. Because,
the ARMY controlled DOJ and the ARMY also control what will be incorporated and reported
in the GAO reports to the Congress and to the Senate. And DOJ knew about all
of the above, and that the NMD EKV concept is in non compliance with laws of
Physics and did nothing. Therefore Raytheon/TRW [Currently Northrop/Grumman] NMD EKV technologies are for ever
fragile, and the Nation security is in danger.
-
GOD Save
America.
Please Help and Donate money to carry these cases to the Supreme Court in
Washington. Because this is the ONLY way to remove these false technologies
from protecting the Nation.