|
Home
KNDU187 Book
KNDU2008 Patent
Criminal Reports
Jamieson Committee
Fragile NMD Technology
GAO Reports
US Attorney General
Case 96-3065 RSWL
Physics Laws
FBI Letter
Consulting US Government
Government Corruption
Please Help
Contact me
N. Korea Threat
Raytheon CV 01-4937 RSWL
Boeing & HOT BACK-UP
Raytheon Legal VA
MIT/LL False Reports
My Reply 05-5063
International
Current News
Northrop/G. HR Manual
'SSSS' Yellow
NAVY - Games
US Supreme Court
Links
Letter to US President
Wally Beitzel Deposition
Conflict Of Interest
ARMY Scope Of Work
NMD Contract DASG60-90-C-0165
Ray Maddalone Deposition
Roy Danchick Deposition
Henry J. Crowder Deposition
NMD-My-Copyrights
New Warhead Patent
Hon. Congressman H. Berman
FOIA - refused
State Bar Complaint
Case D.C. 06-4010 DDP (JCx)
| |
During 1996 - 1999 while consulting for the US Government I
had a analyzed/tested/validate the Raytheon NMDTechnology
concept. To my horror on May 7, 2001 during a job interview in Raytheon
Arizona I found that no change of concept was made to NMD
technologies. Raytheon was still implementing the same false concept
invented by MIT/LL.
The only deference existed between Raytheon and TRW [Currently
Northrop/Grumman] was the different mathematical tools used to implement the
false concept.
While [Currently
Northrop/Grumman] used mathematical tools named Fast Fourier Transform, and
Kalman Filters; Raytheon used Neural Connections.
On my job interview Raytheon employees confirmed that their technology is based on
prior and precise knowledge of the warhead and deployed objects mean
temperatures. When I pointed that this information can NOT ever be known;
that the mean temperature can be within a wide possible rage of temperatures, as
the Government Technical Requirement [TRD]
indicated; Raytheon employees stated that it is the Government problem
not theirs. On 2001 I filed the second Qui-Tam case 01-4937 RSWL were Raytheon
is the Defendant.
But the US Government dismissed qui-tam case 01-4937 RSWL; Asserting State
Secret Privilege, and classifying documents that are basic scientific laws; NOT
to protect National security, but rather cover-up for ARMY and Government
employees violation of law. I filed an Appeal to the Appeal 9th Circuit Case 03-55571,
which is still pending. Requesting to proof the NMD concept is in violation of
the laws of physics and forever fragile. I requested permission to do that by
the use of basic science without classified documents.
-
Please
see Meeting_Minute
of my Job Interview at Raytheon Arizona on May 7, 2001. It is also Trial
Exhibit # 304.
-
Please
see Raytheon_First_Amended_Qui_Tam_Complaint
dated November 3, 2002
-
Please
see Government Asserting State Secret Privilege in Raytheon Qui-Tam case
01-4937 RSWL .
-
Please
see my communication with Dr. Sheldon Wald the NMD Project manager at
Raytheon
-
On
September 26, 2005 Appeal 9th Circuit case 03-55571 was denied. Please refer
to it on my October 10, 2005 - PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.
-
On
January 26, 2006 Petition in Appeal to the 9th Circuit case 03-55571 was Denied. "No Judge has requested a vote on
whether to rehear the matter en banc".
|