To the people of Europe, please purchase and read my book KNDU187, prior to placing US false NMD technologies in your home country. Many secrets for you to figure out. 
KNDU187 paper back book is available. Fiction, or is it? 

ORDER by clicking here on: KNDU187  or on Amazon.com 

NiraSchwartz.com
National Missile Defense [NMD] Fraud;
Government Corruption; 
and
  Trials Exhibits
Whistle Blower [Qui-Tam] Cases: 

D.C. 96-3065 RSWL - Appeal 9^th Circuit Case 03-55495
D.C. 01-4937 RSWL - Appeal 9^th Circuit Case 03-55571 - Petition

US Federal Claims Cases: 03-37C - US Court of Appeal 05-5063 - US Supreme 
US Federal Claims Cases: 03-786C - US Court of Appeal 04-5113

CA State BAR Complaint: 05-2875; Appeal; First Response; US Supreme 05-11161
NAVY Complaint:  20050489 - Final Decline to accept
FOIA - Refused

D.C. 06-4010 DDP (JCx)Schwartz vs. Government, MIT, LLNL, AERO
Appeal to the 9th Circuit case 07-55091

Home
KNDU187 Book
KNDU2008 Patent
Criminal Reports
Jamieson Committee
Fragile NMD Technology
GAO Reports
US Attorney General
Case 96-3065 RSWL
Physics Laws
FBI Letter
Consulting US Government
Government Corruption
Please Help
Contact me
N. Korea Threat
Raytheon CV 01-4937 RSWL
Boeing & HOT BACK-UP
Raytheon Legal VA
MIT/LL False Reports
My Reply 05-5063
International
Current News
Northrop/G. HR Manual
'SSSS' Yellow
NAVY - Games
US Supreme Court
Links
Letter to US President
Wally Beitzel Deposition
Conflict Of Interest
ARMY Scope Of Work
NMD Contract DASG60-90-C-0165
Ray Maddalone Deposition
Roy Danchick Deposition
Henry J. Crowder Deposition
NMD-My-Copyrights
New Warhead Patent
Hon. Congressman H. Berman
FOIA - refused
State Bar Complaint
Case D.C. 06-4010 DDP (JCx)

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CASE 05-6194 - PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

On Dec 29, 2004 the US Court Court of Federal Claims case 03-37C Hon. Judge Bush filed an Unpublished decision to dismiss case 03-37C were I requested to be paid for my consulting work to the Government. The Court made few corrections to its decision dated Dec 29, 2003 and did not even care while filing it to leave the date a year late; The Decision was Unpublished; by this Website I make it publish, and ask the Supreme Court Questions regarding it; This court refused to incorporate Federal Order dated 2/9/04 in decision for ruling to dismiss:
      " in an effort to manage its own docket"

The Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit case 05-5063 Affirmed dismissal of case 03-37; This Court court found ORDER 2/9/04 irrelevant to case 03-37C, this time not because of difficulties to manage the case docket, but rather alleging I was a Relator at the time Order was issued, and that Hon. Judge Lew just redacted $1.6 Million dollars from my Jury awarded in Wrongful Termination case, because I told the judge to do so in my admissions. [Qui-Tam claims were dismissed when ORDER was issued; Only Wrongful-Termination claims left]

My Questions to the Supreme Court:

1 Does 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. give the Government the right to unfair use of Relators intellectual property created during a Qui-Tam case investigation as Appeal 7/9/05 Decision Affirmed?

2. Does Appeal 7/9/05 Decision provide "Discrimination in Private Rights" to exclude a Federal ORDER in case 96-3065RSWL from relevancy to Court of Federal Claims case 03-37C, while both cases incorporate same Admission, Issues and point of law?

3. Does Appeal 7/9/05 Decision provide "Discrimination in Private Rights" to excuse the Government from paying Plaintiff $1.6 million earning, while Federal ORDER redacted this earning from Jury award?

4. Is Federal Jury Verdict 12/23/04, and the ORDER 2/9/04 in case 96-3065RSWL in conflict with the Appeal 7/9/05 decision?

My REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION are very compelling; please read them yourself.  This disposition is not citable as precedent. 

Please send any comments, any type of contribution  to the following address. Thank you for your support:

Hon. Judge R.S.W. Lew 
US District Court Central District of California
Spring Street, Los Angeles
Att: Dr. Nira Schwartz case 96-3065RSWL

[Now since the US Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit, case 05-5063 Affirmed  that Hon. Judge Lew reduced $1.6 million dollar from my Jury award, because I  told the Judge so by admissions. Establishing a unique relationship between me and the Judge.  Which I feel entitle me to use that address as personal address, and hope the Judge will forward your comment/contributions to me]