The Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit case
05-5063 Affirmed dismissal of case 03-37; This Court
court found ORDER 2/9/04 irrelevant to case 03-37C,
this time not because of difficulties to manage the case
docket, but rather alleging I was a Relator at the time
Order was issued, and that Hon. Judge Lew just
redacted $1.6 Million dollars from my Jury awarded
in Wrongful Termination case, because I told the
judge to do so in my admissions. [Qui-Tam claims
were dismissed when ORDER was issued; Only
Wrongful-Termination claims left]
1 Does 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. give the Government the right to unfair use
of Relators intellectual property created during a Qui-Tam case investigation
as Appeal 7/9/05 Decision Affirmed?
2. Does Appeal 7/9/05 Decision provide "Discrimination in Private Rights" to
exclude a Federal ORDER in case 96-3065RSWL from relevancy to Court
of Federal Claims case 03-37C, while both cases incorporate same
Admission, Issues and point of law?
3. Does Appeal 7/9/05 Decision provide "Discrimination in Private Rights" to
excuse the Government from paying Plaintiff $1.6 million earning, while
Federal ORDER redacted this earning from Jury award?
4. Is Federal Jury Verdict 12/23/04, and the ORDER 2/9/04 in case
96-3065RSWL in conflict with the Appeal 7/9/05 decision?
My REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION are very compelling;
please read them yourself. This disposition is not citable as precedent.
A
Co
py
of
my
Pet
itio
n
wa
s
mai
led
to:
Sol
icit
or
Ge
ner
al
Of
the
US
,
De
par
tm
ent
of
Jus
tice
,
Ro
om
56
14
95
0
Pe
nns
ylv
ani
a
Av
e.,
N.
W.
W
ash
ingt
on,
D.
C.
20
53
0-
00
1
On September 26, 2005 the
Solicitor Genera Paul D.
Clement waived his right to
respond to the Petition in US
Supreme Court CASE
05-6194.
Please send any comments, any type of contribution
to the following address. Thank you for your
support:
Hon. Judge R.S.W. Lew
US District Court Central District of California
Spring Street, Los Angeles
Att: Dr. Nira Schwartz case 96-3065RSWL
[Now since the US Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit, case 05-5063
Affirmed that Hon. Judge Lew reduced $1.6 million dollar from my Jury
award, because I told the Judge so by admissions. Establishing a unique
relationship between me and the Judge. Which I feel entitle me to use that
address as personal address, and hope the Judge will forward your
comment/contributions to me]
US SUPREME COURT
America, I tried, and failed, and very sorry...I used to tools
available to me such as qui-tam court cases, court documents
and exhibits, depositions, physics laws, US patent office to
show you that there is no protection against nuclear missile
attack, ever... But there is another way to go, global peace, and
instead President Obama elected to develop New National
Missile defense, when there is no such a thing...I am
blackballed, with no ability to find a job, and now after being
the inventor of 26 US patented technologies, and after my last
warhead patent was granted, the USA DOD [Department Of
defense] instructed the US patent office to grant me NO more
US patents, and additional patent pending of mine [Application
11/470,060] is falsely being denied again and again.......
- On September 13, 2007, the 9th Cir. Hon. Judges
released the Government from being defendants in my
case D.C. 06-4010 DDP alleging their decision was
based on "A review of the record". But these 9th Cir.
Hon. Judges could not have made such a review because
the "RECORD_ON_APPEAL send to Circuit Court" only
three weeks latter on October 4, 2007...
- SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CASE
05-6194 - PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
TO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
- On Dec 29, 2004 the US Court Court of Federal Claims
case 03-37C Hon. Judge Bush filed an Unpublished
decision to dismiss case 03-37C were I requested to be
paid for my consulting work to the Government. The
Court made few corrections to its decision dated Dec 29,
2003 and did not even care while filing it to leave the date
a year late; The Decision was Unpublished; by this
Website I make it publish, and ask the Supreme Court
Questions regarding it; This court refused to incorporate
Federal Order dated 2/9/04 in decision for ruling to
dismiss:
" in an effort to manage its own docket"....
|
|